Topic summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos2,696 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rhetoric results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.5% saturation with 2,210 hits. Analysis detected 13,379 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,784 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 41% (9,216 of 15,569 topics). This Rhetoric is better (less manipulative) than 59.20% of the peer group.
Rhetoric
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 10,784
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

41% percentile
025507510040.8% percentile
2.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 20.5%20.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 16.4%16.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.3%7.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 20.5%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Straw Man: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate