Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Retatrutide results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 38.7% saturation with 1,318 hits. Analysis detected 6,408 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,404 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Retatrutide is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Retatrutide
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,404
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 38.7%38.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.0%8.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 19.9%19.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.7%8.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.8%7.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 23.6%23.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 38.7%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 23.6%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 19.9%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.9%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos