Topic summary
⁠32%1 analyzed article/video1,155 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Retaliatory Strikes results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, False Dilemma, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 596 hits. Analysis detected 3,689 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,620 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (7,942 of 16,562 topics). This Retaliatory Strikes is worse (more manipulative) than 52.00% of the peer group.
Retaliatory Strikes
Topic details
Total words: 4,620
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

52% percentile
025507510052.0% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 9.8%9.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.4%12.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.9%12.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%False Dilemma: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 1.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos