Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 361 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Retail Turnaround results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 53.6% saturation with 581 hits . Analysis detected 2,667 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,083 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.7% and a BS Rank of 95% (928 of 16,562 topics). This Retail Turnaround is worse (more manipulative) than 94.40% of the peer group. Retail Turnaround
Topic details
Total words: 1,083
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
94% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 94.4% percentile 11.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 53.6% 53.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 51.8% 51.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 18.7% 18.7% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Topic 11.3% 11.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 20.0% 20.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 23.2% 23.2% Personal Incredulity Sitewide 0.2% Topic 5.8% 5.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Optimism Bias: Topic 53.6%, sitewide 6.0% Framing Effect: Topic 51.8%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 23.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 20.0%, sitewide 11.1% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 18.7%, sitewide 4.6% Bandwagon: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 9.1% Anchoring Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 4.0% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.0%, sitewide 3.3% Personal Incredulity: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 0.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.5% Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.3% Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst