Topic summary
⁠73%2 analyzed articles/videos1,927 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Restoration Projects results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 533 hits. Analysis detected 4,986 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,031 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (10,703 of 16,562 topics). This Restoration Projects is better (less manipulative) than 64.60% of the peer group.
Restoration Projects
Topic details
Total words: 6,031
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

35% percentile
025507510035.4% percentile
2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.6%5.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.4%3.4%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 5.5%5.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 8.8%8.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos