Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video657 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Restaurant Profile results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Halo Effect, and Anecdotal, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 33.1% saturation with 653 hits. Analysis detected 3,693 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,971 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠89% (1,806 of 16,236 topics). This Restaurant Profile is worse (more manipulative) than 88.90% of the peer group.
Restaurant Profile
Topic details
Total words: 1,971
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

89% percentile
025507510088.9% percentile
8.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 33.1%33.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 22.4%22.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.1%4.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.5%12.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 10.8%10.8%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 10.9%10.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 13.3%13.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 22.8%22.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 9.4%9.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 33.1%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 22.8%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 22.4%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 11.1%Bandwagon: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 4.6%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Nature: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.4%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos