Topic summary
⁠21%1 analyzed article/video637 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Restaurant Inspections results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Recency Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 286 hits. Analysis detected 1,187 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,548 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (9,112 of 16,562 topics). This Restaurant Inspections is better (less manipulative) than 55.00% of the peer group.
Restaurant Inspections
Topic details
Total words: 2,548
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

45% percentile
025507510045.0% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.2%11.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.6%0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 7.3%7.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 7.0%7.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Horn Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos