Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,294 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Restaurant Economics results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 666 hits. Analysis detected 5,938 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,176 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (8,895 of 16,562 topics). This Restaurant Economics is better (less manipulative) than 53.70% of the peer group.
Restaurant Economics
Topic details
Total words: 5,176
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510046.3% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.9%9.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 11.9%11.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.9%12.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.3%3.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Bandwagon: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos