Topic summary
65% 4 analyzed articles/videos 4,031 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Restaurant Closures results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 2,516 hits . Analysis detected 15,824 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,931 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (10,941 of 16,562 topics). This Restaurant Closures is better (less manipulative) than 66.10% of the peer group. Restaurant Closures
Topic details
Total words: 15,931
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.9% percentile 2.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles15.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.5% 8.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 15.8% 15.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 5.2% Loss Aversion: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 2.5% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst