Topic summary
⁠15%1 analyzed article/video1,301 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Respiratory Illnesses results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Hasty Generalization, and Overconfidence Bias, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 5.2% saturation with 202 hits. Analysis detected 1,948 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,903 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠15% (14,204 of 16,562 topics). This Respiratory Illnesses is better (less manipulative) than 85.80% of the peer group.
Respiratory Illnesses
Topic details
Total words: 3,903
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

14% percentile
025507510014.2% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.6%4.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.8%Special Pleading: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos