Author summary
16% 1 analyzed article/video 1,301 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Clarissa Sosin results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Hasty Generalization , and Overconfidence Bias , with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 5.2% saturation with 202 hits . Analysis detected 1,948 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,903 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 21% (5,095 of 6,382 authors). This Clarissa Sosin is better (less manipulative) than 79.80% of the peer group. Clarissa Sosin
Author details
Total words: 3,903
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.2% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.6% 4.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 4.6%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.8% Special Pleading: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst