Topic summary
77% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,100 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Research Grants results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 22.2% saturation with 824 hits . Analysis detected 3,736 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,710 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 62% (6,367 of 16,562 topics). This Research Grants is worse (more manipulative) than 61.60% of the peer group. Research Grants
Topic details
Total words: 3,710
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.6% percentile 3.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 22.2% 22.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.6% 10.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.5% 8.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 26.9% Confirmation Bias: Topic 22.2%, sitewide 7.5% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Slippery Slope: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst