Topic summary
⁠41%2 analyzed articles/videos1,261 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Research And Development results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 600 hits. Analysis detected 3,717 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,311 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (8,580 of 16,562 topics). This Research And Development is better (less manipulative) than 51.80% of the peer group.
Research And Development
Topic details
Total words: 4,311
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

48% percentile
025507510048.2% percentile
2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.9%4.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.9%13.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 11.4%11.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos