Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,461 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Reproductive Technology results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 570 hits. Analysis detected 4,280 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,844 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (10,333 of 16,562 topics). This Reproductive Technology is better (less manipulative) than 62.40% of the peer group.
Reproductive Technology
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠38%Reproductive Technology (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 5,844
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

38% percentile
025507510037.6% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.8%9.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.8%2.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.5%False Dilemma: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos