Topic summary
32%1 analyzed article/video887 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Reproductive Biology results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Loss Aversion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 339 hits. Analysis detected 2,759 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,548 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 41% (9,255 of 15,689 topics). This Reproductive Biology is better (less manipulative) than 59.00% of the peer group.
Reproductive Biology
Topic details
Total words: 3,548
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

41% percentile
025507510041.0% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.9%7.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 7.2%7.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.9%2.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 2.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos