Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,031 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Representation results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 623 hits. Analysis detected 5,326 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,607 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (10,673 of 16,562 topics). This Representation is better (less manipulative) than 64.40% of the peer group.
Representation
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,607
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510035.6% percentile
2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.3%9.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 9.4%9.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.4%3.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.8%2.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos