Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video699 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rep Eric Swalwell results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 55.4% saturation with 1,162 hits. Analysis detected 4,979 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,097 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠90% (1,792 of 16,562 topics). This Rep Eric Swalwell is worse (more manipulative) than 89.20% of the peer group.
Rep Eric Swalwell
Topic details
Total words: 2,097
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

89% percentile
025507510089.2% percentile
8.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 48.6%48.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 55.4%55.4%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 16.4%16.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.2%9.2%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 4.5%4.5%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 4.8%4.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 55.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 48.6%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 21.9%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Begging the Question: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Horn Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos