Topic summary
⁠62%1 analyzed article/video1,001 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rental Fraud results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 316 hits. Analysis detected 2,275 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,003 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (7,678 of 16,562 topics). This Rental Fraud is worse (more manipulative) than 53.60% of the peer group.
Rental Fraud
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,003
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

54% percentile
025507510053.6% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.5%10.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 7.3%7.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Personal Incredulity: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos