Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,444 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Renewable Energy Policy results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 692 hits. Analysis detected 8,653 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,776 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (12,776 of 15,769 topics). This Renewable Energy Policy is better (less manipulative) than 81.00% of the peer group.
Renewable Energy Policy
Topic details
Total words: 9,776
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

19% percentile
025507510019.0% percentile
1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.2%6.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.4%6.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 7.1%7.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.3%3.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.5%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos