Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Renewable Energy Development results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 677 hits. Analysis detected 5,115 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,203 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Renewable Energy Development is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Renewable Energy Development
Topic details
Total words: 7,203
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.5%5.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 9.4%9.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.0%7.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 9.4%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos