Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video600 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Religious Freedom In Sports results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Framing Effect, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 36.8% saturation with 884 hits. Analysis detected 4,469 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,400 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of 81% (3,087 of 15,914 topics). This Religious Freedom In Sports is worse (more manipulative) than 80.60% of the peer group.
Religious Freedom In Sports
Topic details
Total words: 2,400
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

81% percentile
025507510080.6% percentile
5.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 36.8%36.8%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 24.9%24.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 18.8%18.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.2%0.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 9.3%9.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 21.5%21.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 36.8%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 21.5%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 24.9%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 18.8%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Bandwagon: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Begging the Question: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos