Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Religious Controversy results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 47.9% saturation with 2,194 hits. Analysis detected 7,345 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,576 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ā 0% (0 of 16,246 topics). This Religious Controversy is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Religious Controversy
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
ā 0%Religious Controversy (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 4,576
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 48.0%48.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 7.1%7.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.0%13.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.8%5.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.0%12.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 48.0%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 24.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 8.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 7.1%, sitewide 0.8%Halo Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.5%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.6%Personal Incredulity: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos