Topic summary
⁠23%1 analyzed article/video592 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Relationship Drama results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 330 hits. Analysis detected 1,328 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,368 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠29% (11,827 of 16,562 topics). This Relationship Drama is better (less manipulative) than 71.40% of the peer group.
Relationship Drama
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠29%Relationship Drama (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,368
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

29% percentile
025507510028.6% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.4%6.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 13.9%13.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.4%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos