Topic summary
ā 34%1 analyzed article/video574 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Relationship Advice results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 256 hits. Analysis detected 1,674 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,296 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ā 45% (9,245 of 16,562 topics). This Relationship Advice is better (less manipulative) than 55.80% of the peer group.
Relationship Advice
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 45%Relationship Advice (selected)3%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,296
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

44% percentile
025507510044.2% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.9%4.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 11.2%11.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.4%3.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 3.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.4%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos