Topic summary
⁠70%3 analyzed articles/videos3,324 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Regulatory Enforcement results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 1,304 hits. Analysis detected 9,520 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,972 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (10,868 of 15,689 topics). This Regulatory Enforcement is better (less manipulative) than 69.30% of the peer group.
Regulatory Enforcement
Topic details
Total words: 9,972
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

31% percentile
025507510030.7% percentile
2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles10K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.5%9.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.1%8.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.1%13.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.1%3.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 7.3%7.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 3.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos