Topic summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Regulatory Agencies results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 1,364 hits. Analysis detected 9,200 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,495 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Regulatory Agencies is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Regulatory Agencies
Topic details
Total words: 9,495
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.4%9.4%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 14.4%14.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.4%6.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.8%8.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.6%10.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate