Topic summary
⁠36%3 analyzed articles/videos870 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Regulatory Affairs results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 454 hits. Analysis detected 4,134 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,926 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (10,216 of 16,562 topics). This Regulatory Affairs is better (less manipulative) than 61.70% of the peer group.
Regulatory Affairs
Topic details
Total words: 4,926
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

38% percentile
025507510038.3% percentile
2.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.2%9.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.6%7.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 6.9%6.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 0.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos