Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,426 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Regionalism results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 596 hits. Analysis detected 4,769 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,704 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (11,225 of 15,435 topics). This Regionalism is better (less manipulative) than 72.70% of the peer group.
Regionalism
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,704
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

27% percentile
025507510027.3% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 10.2%10.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 4.6%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.5%Straw Man: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos

Order Without Order52%
Foreign Policy29%By Parag Khanna0%4/17/2026, 7:30:20 PM