Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,426 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Parag Khanna results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 596 hits . Analysis detected 4,769 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,704 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 35% (4,009 of 6,170 authors). This Parag Khanna is better (less manipulative) than 65.00% of the peer group. Parag Khanna
Author details
Total words: 5,704
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.0% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 10.2% 10.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.4%, sitewide 8.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 10.2%, sitewide 4.6% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.5% Straw Man: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.1% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst