Topic summary
⁠73%1 analyzed article/video1,625 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Regional Planning results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 1,028 hits. Analysis detected 6,775 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,500 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (7,046 of 16,562 topics). This Regional Planning is worse (more manipulative) than 57.50% of the peer group.
Regional Planning
Topic details
Total words: 6,500
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

58% percentile
025507510057.5% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 15.8%15.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.5%7.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 4.8%4.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 10.0%10.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.5%False Dilemma: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos