Topic summary
⁠15%2 analyzed articles/videos993 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Red Light Therapy results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Indoctrination, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 241 hits. Analysis detected 2,124 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,979 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (9,458 of 16,562 topics). This Red Light Therapy is better (less manipulative) than 57.10% of the peer group.
Red Light Therapy
Topic details
Total words: 2,979
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510042.9% percentile
2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.0%6.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.9%5.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.4%Circular Reasoning: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos