Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video845 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Red Card Suspension results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 354 hits. Analysis detected 2,297 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,380 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (9,012 of 15,361 topics). This Red Card Suspension is better (less manipulative) than 58.70% of the peer group.
Red Card Suspension
Topic details
Total words: 3,380
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

41% percentile
025507510041.3% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.5%10.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.2%6.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.0%3.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.1%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos