Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,054 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Reckless Driving results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 24.9% saturation with 1,050 hits . Analysis detected 3,318 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,216 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 67% (5,610 of 16,562 topics). This Reckless Driving is worse (more manipulative) than 66.10% of the peer group. Reckless Driving
Topic details
Total words: 4,216
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.1% percentile 3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 24.9% 24.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 5.9% 5.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 24.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.5%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Recency Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst