Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video124 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Real Wages results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Primacy Effect, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 18.5% saturation with 92 hits. Analysis detected 530 faulty-reasoning hits from 496 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠92% (1,370 of 16,562 topics). This Real Wages is worse (more manipulative) than 91.70% of the peer group.
Real Wages
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 496
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

92% percentile
025507510091.7% percentile
9.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles496 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.5%14.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 18.6%18.6%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Topic 10.5%10.5%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 6.7%6.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.5%13.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 6.7%6.7%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 6.7%6.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.3%9.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.3%7.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 6.7%6.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 11.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 0.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 2.7%Red Herring: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos