Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,152 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Raul Castro results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , In-Group Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 406 hits . Analysis detected 3,207 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,456 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 44% (8,666 of 15,447 topics). This Raul Castro is better (less manipulative) than 56.10% of the peer group. Raul Castro
Topic details
Total words: 3,456
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.9% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.8% 11.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.0% Indoctrination: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst