Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos384 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rare Earth Elements results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 1,200 hits. Analysis detected 9,157 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,060 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠7% (15,495 of 16,562 topics). This Rare Earth Elements is better (less manipulative) than 93.60% of the peer group.
Rare Earth Elements
Topic details
Total words: 14,060
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

6% percentile
02550751006.4% percentile
1.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles14.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.9%7.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.5%8.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos