Topic summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,623 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rape Trial results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Ad Hominem, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 753 hits. Analysis detected 6,133 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,492 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 39% (10,128 of 16,562 topics). This Rape Trial is better (less manipulative) than 61.10% of the peer group.
Rape Trial
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,492
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

39% percentile
025507510038.9% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.6%11.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.2%7.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 11.0%11.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.2%11.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate