Topic summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,623 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rape Trial results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Ad Hominem , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 753 hits . Analysis detected 6,133 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,492 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 39% (10,128 of 16,562 topics). This Rape Trial is better (less manipulative) than 61.10% of the peer group. Rape Trial
Topic details
Total words: 6,492
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.9% percentile 2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.6% 11.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 11.0% 11.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 11.2% 11.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst