Topic summary
25% 7 analyzed articles/videos 3,503 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rape Charges results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 1,381 hits . Analysis detected 11,006 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,955 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (10,845 of 15,772 topics). This Rape Charges is better (less manipulative) than 68.80% of the peer group. Rape Charges
Topic details
Total words: 12,955
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.2% percentile 2.2% BS Score7 analyzed articles13K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.7% 10.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 8.7% 8.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Begging the Question: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Horn Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.0% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst