Topic summary
⁠12%2 analyzed articles/videos1,638 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rape results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 511 hits. Analysis detected 3,801 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,271 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (12,387 of 16,562 topics). This Rape is better (less manipulative) than 74.80% of the peer group.
Rape
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,271
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

25% percentile
025507510025.2% percentile
2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.7%9.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.2%7.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.1%0.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.4%3.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos