Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video773 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rankings results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Halo Effect, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 34.1% saturation with 791 hits. Analysis detected 5,048 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,319 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠88% (1,987 of 16,562 topics). This Rankings is worse (more manipulative) than 88.00% of the peer group.
Rankings
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,319
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

88% percentile
025507510088.0% percentile
7.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 34.1%34.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 19.9%19.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 18.2%18.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 12.4%12.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 24.5%24.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.3%7.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.2%14.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.2%7.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 34.1%, sitewide 4.6%Framing Effect: Topic 25.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 24.5%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 19.9%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 19.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 18.2%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%Bandwagon: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 3.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.2%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos