Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos2,714 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rams Settlement Funds results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 913 hits. Analysis detected 5,694 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,268 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠8% (14,948 of 16,194 topics). This Rams Settlement Funds is better (less manipulative) than 92.30% of the peer group.
Rams Settlement Funds
Topic details
Total words: 10,268
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

8% percentile
02550751007.7% percentile
1.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.1%4.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.9%8.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos