Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video838 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rams Settlement results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Optimism Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 389 hits. Analysis detected 2,901 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,352 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (11,100 of 16,562 topics). This Rams Settlement is better (less manipulative) than 67.00% of the peer group.
Rams Settlement
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,352
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

33% percentile
025507510033.0% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.6%11.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.2%2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.2%0.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 6.7%6.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos