Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video714 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Radio Technology results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Biased Writer Voice, and Overconfidence Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 414 hits. Analysis detected 1,802 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,856 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (11,588 of 16,446 topics). This Radio Technology is better (less manipulative) than 70.50% of the peer group.
Radio Technology
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠30%Radio Technology (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,856
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

30% percentile
025507510029.5% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 14.5%14.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.1%3.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.5%7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.4%False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos