Topic summary
82% 1 analyzed article/video 1,835 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Radicalization results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Politically Left Leaning Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 633 hits . Analysis detected 5,635 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,505 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 35% (10,852 of 16,562 topics). This Radicalization is better (less manipulative) than 65.50% of the peer group. Radicalization
Topic details
Total words: 5,505
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.5% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.7% 8.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 11.5% 11.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 2.0% Halo Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.6%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Composition/Division: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.2% Loss Aversion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst