Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 508 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Racing results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Anchoring Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 19.6% saturation with 299 hits . Analysis detected 1,655 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,524 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of 80% (3,143 of 15,601 topics). This Racing is worse (more manipulative) than 79.90% of the peer group. Racing
Topic details
Total words: 1,524
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
80% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 79.9% percentile 5.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 19.6% 19.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 15.9% 15.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 14.2% 14.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.9% 11.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 15.9%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Topic 19.6%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 15.9% Anchoring Bias: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 4.0% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.2% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst