Topic summary
⁠83%1 analyzed article/video1,161 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Racial Healing results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Indoctrination, and Appeal to Emotion, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 353 hits. Analysis detected 3,944 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,483 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (7,933 of 15,769 topics). This Racial Healing is better (less manipulative) than 50.30% of the peer group.
Racial Healing
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,483
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

50% percentile
025507510049.7% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.5%9.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.0%7.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 8.0%8.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.3%2.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.9%4.9%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.2%6.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 5.3%Bandwagon: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos