Topic summary
⁠44%1 analyzed article/video3,088 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Racial Bias In Healthcare results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 1,055 hits. Analysis detected 6,633 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,264 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (11,732 of 16,562 topics). This Racial Bias In Healthcare is better (less manipulative) than 70.80% of the peer group.
Racial Bias In Healthcare
Topic details
Total words: 9,264
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

29% percentile
025507510029.2% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.4%11.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.5%9.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.7%7.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos