Topic summary
⁠16%2 analyzed articles/videos2,519 analyzed words
BS Summary: These R And B results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Hasty Generalization, and Anecdotal, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 954 hits. Analysis detected 5,714 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,161 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (13,894 of 16,558 topics). This R And B is better (less manipulative) than 83.90% of the peer group.
R And B
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 9,161
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

16% percentile
025507510016.1% percentile
1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 10.4%10.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos