Author summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,203 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Janelle Ash results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Optimism Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 600 hits . Analysis detected 5,986 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,660 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 66% (2,316 of 6,628 authors). This Janelle Ash is worse (more manipulative) than 65.10% of the peer group. Janelle Ash
Author details
Total words: 4,660
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.1% percentile 3.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.3% 8.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.6% 5.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 11.3% 11.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 9.3% 9.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 12.9% 12.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 6.0% 6.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.9%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 11.3%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 9.3%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Author 6.7%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.0%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.5% Loss Aversion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst