Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,985 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Quo Warranto results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and In-Group Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 20.3% saturation with 1,206 hits. Analysis detected 6,039 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,955 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (8,246 of 16,562 topics). This Quo Warranto is worse (more manipulative) than 50.20% of the peer group.
Quo Warranto
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠51%Quo Warranto (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 5,955
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

50% percentile
025507510050.2% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 20.3%20.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.3%9.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.5%1.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 20.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Horn Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Straw Man: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos